THE GRACIOUS WAY OUT WITH IRAN

TO DISARM IRAN'S NUCLEAR EFFORT, REKINDLE WORLD NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT.

What does the USA want with Iran? Under G. W. Bush, the USA wanted to impose its system, and itself, all over the world. Bush repeated the fateful words that condemned Athens, and Greek civilization, to disaster, more than 24 centuries ago: "Either you are with us, or you are against us". The USA wanted war. And most, more than 80%, of the US population agreed. The joke was :"Everybody wants to go to Baghdad, real men want to go to Teheran". So now what?

There is a new president now. So, hopefully, things are changing. Hope we can believe in. But the fact remains that there was this vast hostility, of most of the American population against Iran, recently. Did the USA change completely in 5 years? Or is the truth hidden below a TARP?

Vice President Joseph Biden's - "Continue down your current course and there will be pressure and isolation" - was exactly wrong not just because it threatens Iran, but because it is forbidden for Teheran to get a nuclear bomb or two. Great, But, meanwhile, next door, Pakistan has dozens of thermonuclear bombs in an infinitely more dangerous situation. How logical is that? After all, what is the worse that can happen with an Iranian nuclear bomb? No more Israel? No more Iran? How realistic is that?

Iran has not invaded the region where Israel is found since Roman emperor Heraclius, 14 centuries ago (and Heraclius then destroyed the Iranians, allowing the success of the Arabs, but I am digressing...). It seems unlikely that Iran wants to commit suicide, so the probability of an Iranian attack is negligible.

The worst that can happen with the Pakistani thermonuclear bombs is nuclear world war. Pakistan is giving itself the means to make much more thermonuclear bombs, but nobody seems to have noticed. Maybe it's because Al Qaeda was running the country until recently? OK, I am getting confused with the ISI. Is there a difference? In any case, personnel affiliated to the ISI just attacked India in Mumbai, so the probability of a Pakistani nuclear attack on whoever is high.

So what does the USA want? World peace first, or something else first?

There is a serious potential world nuclear arm race problem. Iran has to be stopped, but it's understandable that Iran agree only if others held back their giant nuclear horses. Russia and the USA have too many weapons, and are not respecting the nuclear non proliferation deal more or less signed a long time ago.

Disarming Iran nuke potential, inspecting it for weapons enrichment is a great idea, and it will work. As long as it is extended worldwide.

Change Iranians can believe in.

Patrice Ayme
February 09, 2009 7:15 am

http://patriceayme.wordpress.com/